Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

... blithering idiot ...

FTFM

#27

What? You live in a f*****g cave?

Thirty-six states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls. The remaining 14 states and Washington, D.C., use other methods to verify the identity of voters. Most frequently, other identifying information provided at the polling place, such as a signature, is checked against information on file. See NCSL'sVoter Verification Without ID Documents.

#6

I too like the events, some of which I might watch live. Never the propaganda that is the opening ceremony.

Try AdBlock Plus and Ghostery. When a site denies access because of that I exit a won't go back. Like I said, I avoid ads any way I can.

... radio and tv ads ...

A you problem. I avoid any advertising in any way I can. Including turning it off and walking out. Whatever, I don't care what they have to say.

Seriously, you watched this ---- live? My condolences.

WTF would you post an article that's behind a paywall?

I generally loath opinion pieces. This one seems to bring data.

No, the legislation required is to reign in the Buffoon's ability to push not just immigration enforcement far beyond its legislative mandate. There's nothing wrong with rational border controls and immigration checks. What's wrong is what the Buffoon and his goons are doing. That is a failure of Congress. That is a failure long made. That will continue.

The Buffoon exposes a couple flaws in the Founder's thought process about the election of presidents. First they believed that candidates would fundamentally be persons of good moral character with the best interests of the country in mind. That pretty much upheld until it came along.

Second, they put a stop gap in between stupid voters and the potential of an immoral narcissist like the Buffoon, the Electoral College. State legislatures screwed that one up with statutes mandating how Electors vote instead of Electors voting their conscious. That too pretty much upheld until it came along.

So yeah, there oughta be a law. What should it be?

Republicans should be concerned about not only Hispanics but many demographics they moved up with last time. There are only so many MAGA morons out there and they ain't enough when a chunk of the the middle says f**k you, I ain't doin' this s**t no mo'.

*13

Been there done that. My second trip on warfarin, a very tricky drug to administer, one day found me light headed, dizzy, staggering. Stopped taking it, med advice, back to normal in about a day. Point? Blood thinners can cause real, severe problems. I doubt aspirin does.

... find that the situation with respect to Cuba constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat ...

That's funny. Like laugh out loud, HA HA HA HA, funny. The description in the lede paragraph, and the E.O., describes the US diplomatic stance since Castro took over. But now, because Buffoon, it's an oh s**t we gotta do something now emergency. Funny.

IRL, it's sad. Sad that this degree of stupid is leading this country. Thinking courts will buy this stupidity? Sad.

I really don't see much, if any thing, coming out of this. Other than partisan political performance theater. That I'll ignore.

44

First step, admit you have a problem. Watching TV news. Just stop.

I quit watching TV news probably 20 years ago. I just can't stand some talking head preaching at me.

I have never been a Buffoon fan dating back decades before he became a political character. That said, this is gross beyond words. The g*d d**n m***********g president of the US is f*****g suing the f******g he purportedly leads for f*****g billions! Did you see that? Did you connect to that? The f*****g president sued his government. G** D**n. I don't know any more disgusting words for this.

I cannot imagine how any person can support this.

3

Binary dumb***k.

Just a couple of instances I found in my search.

Thanks for reiterating my point. A few random cases do not a mass problem make.

If it is a mass problem the company would be sued into oblivion. Neither your nor my google searches support that conclusion. Ergo the reference to multiple youtube videos is nothing more than anecdotes that apparently don't stand up to judicial scrutiny.

Again, massive problem equals massive litigation. That ain't happnin'. Conclusion, accidental discharge ain't a mass problem.

D**n. Blew that one. Try again; "... is an express exclusion from gun manufacturer immunity ... for injuries.

The gun with a notorious reputation with many videos showing the gun spontaneously discharging in holsters with hands nowhere near it.

If the "accidental" discharge was as prevalent as you wish to portray it then the company would have been sued out of existence years ago. After all, products liability is an express exclusion from gun manufacturer liability for gun injuries.

59 and 60

Throwing out one paragraph quotes without context is meaningless.

Have you Shepardized those cases?

EtAl whats the difference between a "whole number of persons" and a "number of persons"? Is this in regards to the slavery ratios?

Read the article. The apportionment clause of the Fourteenth Amendment had a specific purpose. Citizenship vs. person was debated. Person was chosen.

BTW, "person" has not been defined in the apportionment clause context. Various statues with varying definitions for varying purposes are largely irrelevant.