If these lawyers want their state licenses, needed after their DOJ position ends, they must deal with their state bar.

There is nothing feds in general, and bondi in particular, can do to change that.

That didn't age well.

#99

The posture, the tone, the pace, it just drips of narcissism and self aggrandizement. And I only watched about 3 minutes, I can only imagine how embarrassing for the country the rest has been.

Jeez, I just watched about 3 minutes of this s***. There's not enough mind bleach ...

Voter fraud happens. It happens with both parties. Laws address it's miniscuity. It's not a problem. Get over it.

I don't see a link to the documents but neither am I seeing anything nefarious. Rules of civil procedure, both state and federal, provide for requests for discovery from third parties then there's the administrative requests. Those requests are generally considered as subpoenas.

Making them stick is another story.

... few percent is all that is required to swing many elections, ...

I don't think data upholds that. That aside, the concerns you voice are general. They exist without this stupid.

My guess? It's gonna TACO. Again.

#17

I'm not seeing the confusion and suppression. I foresee the Buffoon signing something, the courts stopping it and normal voting processes proceed.

What do you see that foresee that leads to confusion and suppression?

The probability to this coming to fruition is somewhere between zero and none. Calm down. Breathe.

For the vast majority of history, the concept of a nation/state did not exist.

What? You're gonna have to flesh that one out a bit. Start with Rome.

#18

It's behind a f*****g paywall, idgit. When will you learn this? The f*****g WSJ is f*****g paywalled. This ain't the first time you pulled this s**t.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

Since there are multiple threads on this subject I will cross post this comment.

Some may see this as a failure of the DOJ. I see it as a triumph of our judicial system.

... blithering idiot ...

FTFM

#27

What? You live in a f*****g cave?

Thirty-six states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls. The remaining 14 states and Washington, D.C., use other methods to verify the identity of voters. Most frequently, other identifying information provided at the polling place, such as a signature, is checked against information on file. See NCSL'sVoter Verification Without ID Documents.

#6

I too like the events, some of which I might watch live. Never the propaganda that is the opening ceremony.

Try AdBlock Plus and Ghostery. When a site denies access because of that I exit a won't go back. Like I said, I avoid ads any way I can.

... radio and tv ads ...

A you problem. I avoid any advertising in any way I can. Including turning it off and walking out. Whatever, I don't care what they have to say.

Seriously, you watched this ---- live? My condolences.

WTF would you post an article that's behind a paywall?

I generally loath opinion pieces. This one seems to bring data.

No, the legislation required is to reign in the Buffoon's ability to push not just immigration enforcement far beyond its legislative mandate. There's nothing wrong with rational border controls and immigration checks. What's wrong is what the Buffoon and his goons are doing. That is a failure of Congress. That is a failure long made. That will continue.